I have found it just great for merging stacks of TIFF files out of DXO (then saving the result to DXO as a TIFF). It does what you want (including corrections that can be ‘brushed in’) quickly without fuss and with a very simple interface. A low-priced (I can’t see the price anymore since I own it but I seem to remember it is about $US10) but remarkably functional and reliable tool that, recently, I’ve been using in preference to my long-time favorite: Zerene Stacker. Just upping this old conversation to add a recommendation for the Mac OS: “Focus Stacker” on the App Store. …Be good for someone to talk about staking on Adobe, never used it. …Would be great if DXO supported the RAW file compiled from Sony’s pixel shift. There are times when it does a better job in certain situations than Helicon which boggles the mind (stitching stacks aka panorama).Ībove was for stacking on a rail if you stake astrophotography then perhaps look at PIPP its great for arranging images that will be most suitable for a stack based on their sharpness. I believe they are more or less the same.Īs you know DXO PL gives the tools to get the image how you want it at least remove the faults with the sensor, optics, environment, etc.Īffinity Photo i will sometimes use for its very forgiving in its stacking tolerances. I personally went for Helicon but i think the community may be better in Zerene. Next you will have to download the trial version of both Helicon Focus and Zerene stacker and make the call yourself. Note your camera will need to be able to tether to your computer to use these features. I do like Capture ones file management though for stacking. Other remote software i use is CaptureOne though for me using v12 will not compile the pixel shifted photos together so stick most of the time to Sony’s Remote and Viewer. Additionally can use Sony’s Viewer software which can automatically combine Sony’s Pixel shifted photos into one file for you. Here you can use Remote to stack remotely. Given i shoot with a Sony camera i can take advantage of their free software. Some software i use for stacking and personal highlights of each: and to emphasise the previous point, there is no one way to get this done i could take many routes it really comes down to personal preference, final use case, hard or software availability, etc. As a result i have a plethora of software and will use many in a workflow to get one final image. Personally, i have never found a single stacking software to be dynamic enough let alone be an ace at each feature. I stack A LOT as a hobby and use DXO PL as my primary ‘digital photo developing software’. Helicon is also a often used application for stacking. Garden fun in lockdown…Īs you can see Here SP holds not only focusstacking but also mutishot combining moving objects or deleting moving objects. I think i gona in combination with a tube extenders and flowers in the spring. Now i have a raw based, it’s workspace tiff i suspect, stacking in different way’s. Manual has more control but needs carefull processing. I tried to see if the camera did a good job in auto mode or that a more manual approach is resulting in a better outcome. Choose type of stacking hit execute done. ( first extract stills out the movieclip then proces those and export as tiff or jpeg load into combinezp. I used it to stack the 4k stacking clips my panasonic make for internal stacking ooc-jpegs. User interface is a bit “win 98” it’s origin i think. (full version is much more expensive.)Ĭombine zp is old stuff mostly used by astro photographers. Look through the list below and pick a program meeting your demands.Combine zp and now Silkypix v10 pro for panasonic. Also, you can hone compositional skills and learn to work with. First of all, you find out more about the depth of field, aperture, and focus. Learning this technique is very rewarding. With the best focus stacking software in your arsenal, you can get more control over your images.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |